*Ifremer : French national institute for ocean science and technology
Everywhere in the ocean
Today, this reality is not immediately obvious: we often only worry about the macro plastics visible to the naked eye, which in the end represent "only" 10% of the plastic waste found in the oceans. The rest is made up of microplastics, i.e. fragments of less than 5 millimetres, equivalent to the size of a round grain of rice, or even nanoplastics with a diameter of no more than 1 micrometre, i.e. 10 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair, to give an order of scale. At this infinitesimal size, "these particles are even present in the air and sent back into the atmosphere by sea spray".
Most plastic washed is washed from land to sea
If we want to trace the origins of this plastic, we need to look to the land, where most of the plastic waste originates, carried by the rain into rivers. Once in the water, some macro-waste is deposited on sediments. Some underwater canyons are literally covered in plastic bottles, as shown by the first video images of this pollution analysed in 2021. Others set off on a long journey of several months around the globe and gather in gyres, the gigantic oceanic eddies created when currents converge, at the intersection of which the famous plastic 'continents' are formed. It is the fragmentation of this macro-waste, particularly under the influence of water and UV radiation, that gives rise to micro- and nanoplastics. However, some of this waste ends up directly in the environment in the form of microplastics, such as textile fibres from washing machines, plastic microspheres, a raw material for the plastics industry, tyre fragments and so on.
The Mediterranean holds one of the records for the highest microplastic contamination, while Asian areas such as the Bay of Bengal are the most affected by macro-waste.
Highly toxic for the ecosystem
This plastic 'soup' is not only indigestible, it is downright dangerous for marine fauna. The first direct impact is the risk of entrapment, strangulation or obstruction of the respiratory tracts of marine animals by macroplastics. We all remember the images of turtles struggling with plastic bags! There is also the 'raft' effect for an opportunistic population of bacteria, some of which are potentially pathogenic, viruses and fungi that live on pieces of plastic floating for long-distance crossings. Species have been seen to travel from Japan to the USA using this mode of 'transport'. These arrivals are likely to upset the balance of communities, sometimes to the point of becoming invasive species.
Even in the brains of fish
‘Another indirect consequence of ingesting plastic is that it alters the feeling of satiety in animals, resulting in delayed growth and reduced immune defences. When ingested by living organisms, plastic releases chemical substances such as phthalates and bisphenol, which are endocrine disruptors,’ explains Arnaud Huvet. In the case of our study model, the oyster, we were able to observe experimentally the effects on reproduction, which are then passed on to the next generation. We have also been able to show that ‘new’ plastic has more harmful effects than used plastic due to the release of chemical molecules. Finally, laboratory studies have shown the presence of nanoplastics in the circulatory system of shellfish or fish brains, leading to changes in their behaviour, which is important for feeding, but also in their strategy for escaping predators’.